Hello,
I'm about to buy lens encoders to work with Aximmetry in our studio. I'm considering Indiemark 2 and Viper, for the "low" price. I'm trying to understand how communication work between the encoder and the pc, is it done via cable? My concern is having that many/really long usb cables crossing the studio, along with SDI cablens and such.
Is there a way to having the data wireless from those products?
Also, Which one of those products do you prefer and why?
Thank you
Hi,
Yes both are using cables. USB C in the case of Indiemark, not sure about the Viper (looks like serial, can't say for sure).
Note that you can plug the indiemark (and probably the viper) to a cheap miniPC nearby running the encoder software (eg Loled server) or a community version of Aximmetry and use axibridge to forward via ethernet the data to a remote PC doing the actual rendering and heavy work.
This being said, on a side note, I don't fully understand why any of them are still so expensive, when you have fancier wireless follow focus for half the price doing basically the same stuff (if not more).
Actually, just for kicks, I built myself a prototype with an off-the-shelf rotary encoder (22€ on amazon), a tiny seeeduino xiao (7€) and a 3D printed enclosure, mount and gear (made with fusion 360), with no prior experience. I followed a couple of tutorials on arduino, installed the right libraries, and guess what? It works : I get 2400 pulse per rotation on the shaft in quadrature mode before taking into account the multiplication factor between the lense and encoder gears.
That's more than twice the precision of the viper for less than 40€ in parts. The signal is then sent via serial over usb or OSC to the computer. The only thing missing is a curve interpolation of the receiving end if your focus isn't linear (but for instance, on the manual zoom lense I tested, the zoom factor is linear).
In the meantime, Indiemark seems the lesser evil.